Skip to main content

Featured

关于对24年中国经济形势的一点看法

        今天已经是大年初五,春节也差不多接近尾声了,也是我在老家待的最后一天,刚好饭后闲来无事,终于静下心来有空写一写宏观经济分析。         回顾23年春节前的几个交易日,权益市场比较动荡,中证1000的平值隐含波动率最高冲到了91.48,要知道中证1000的实现波动率中位数也就15左右,而春节前几个交易日的连续大幅下跌和国家队快速出手使得权益市场走出深V形态,历史和隐含波动率也随之快速飙升。                另外伴随着雪球集体敲入、DMA爆仓等各类事件爆发,权益市场一片鬼哭狼嚎,就在大家都在讨论这波大A行情该谁来背锅时,证监会突发换帅。想想之前频繁出现在财经类流量博主文章中的北向、量化、公墓等,这次券商场外衍生品和私募微盘股应该也难逃一劫。都说经济繁荣时,大家都忙着数钱根本没有人在意合不合规,经济衰退时,你连呼吸都是错的,人性就是如此。关于现有微观市场体制的一些问题我之前也写过一些文章,这里不想再赘述,这里只想探讨一下宏观经济形势问题。         经济活动存在周期,这是我们初学经济学时就所熟知的,一个完整的经济周期包含繁荣、衰退、萧条和复苏四个阶段,每个阶段一般没有固定的时间长度和明显的分界线。但是如果回顾国内经济发展的历史情况,我们便可以大致发现国内经济增长开始下滑并不是近两年才开始的,三年疫情只是一场突如其来的黑天鹅,并没有影响整个大经济周期的演变方向。              从上图不难看出,从2001年加入世贸组织后,我国经济增长率同比逐年上升,呈现出快速发展的繁荣景象,也就是当时全球媒体称赞的“中国速度”。直到2008年,美国次贷危机爆发,中国也深受波及,随后政府出台了史上最大规模的“4万亿”扩张政策,虽然帮助中国摆脱了金融危机的泥潭,但也造成了后续非常严重的产能过剩、通货膨...

Total Pageviews

READING 7: DECIPHERING THE LIQUIDITY AND CREDIT CRUNCH 2007– 2008

The two main factors that led to the housing bubble were:

        1. Cheap credit: Large capital inflows from abroad plus the Fed’s lax interest rate policy lead to a low interest rate environment in the United States, making mortgages less expensive for borrowers.
         2. Decline in lending standards: The originate-to-distribute model allowed banks to offload risk to investors, which led to falling lending standards because banks had less incentive to exercise care when approving and monitoring loans.

The related liquidity squeeze and the mortgage crisis was caused by two major banking industry trends:

The originate-to-distribute model and asset-liability maturity mismatches.

        The originate-to-distribute model refers to the process through which banks create securities based on an underlying pool of mortgages, bonds, or other loans and then sell the securities to investors. By originating and selling the securitized assets, the banks transfer the default risk of borrowers to the investors.
         Banks, via structured investment vehicles (SIVs), used commercial paper and repurchase agreements (repos) to roll over short-term financing for investing in long-term assets. The banks’ mismatches in asset-liability maturities exposed the banks to funding liquidity risk.

The financial crisis that stemmed from rising mortgage delinquencies and falling housing prices led to a worldwide liquidity crisis because institutions had

(1) taken on too much leverage,

(2) generated large maturity mismatches between assets and liabilities, and

(3) become too interconnected.

Funding Liquidity and Market Liquidity

Funding liquidity refers to the ability of an institution to settle its obligations when they are due.

  1. Margin/haircut funding risk: A risk that arises when a decline in the collateral value of an asset results in an increase in margin requirement, requiring additional equity capital.
  2. Rollover risk: The risk that investors may not be able to roll over short-term debt to finance the purchase of an asset. The breakdown of short-term commercial paper and repo markets for financing long-term investments was a trigger that transformed the mortgage crisis into a global financial crisis. Short-term debt markets dried up, and SIVs and hedge funds, heavily invested in MBSs and other asset-backed securities, were unable to continue to use these securities as collateral for rolling over debt.
  3. Redemption risk: The risk that depositors will withdraw funds from banks, or that investors will redeem their shares (e.g., from mutual funds). A decline in a source of funding has the same effect as an increase in margin requirements.

Market liquidity refers to the ease with which an asset can be sold without having to lower the price to attract a buyer.

  1. Bid-ask spread can be thought of as the loss that would be sustained by a trader who sells an asset and then immediately buys it back. The higher the spread, the lower the market liquidity, and vice versa.
  2. Market depth refers to the number of units of an asset a trader can buy or sell at the current market quote (bid and ask prices). The greater the market depth, the higher the market liquidity.
  3. Market resiliency describes the length of time it will take an asset to regain its price after the price has fallen temporarily.

Loss Spiral and Margin Spiral

        Loss spiral refers to the forced sale of an asset by a leveraged investor to maintain margin or leverage ratio requirements. A margin spiral refers to the forced sale of an asset as a result of an increase in margins or, equivalently speaking, a decline in the leverage ratio.

Network Risk

        Network risk arises as a result of an increase in counterparty credit risk, which forces contracting parties to seek additional protection and liquidity enhancement. In the absence of a clearinghouse that could facilitate multilateral netting arrangements, an increase in counterparty credit risk can produce systemic effects, as evidenced by the recent global financial crisis.

       

Popular Posts