Skip to main content

Featured

关于对24年中国经济形势的一点看法

        今天已经是大年初五,春节也差不多接近尾声了,也是我在老家待的最后一天,刚好饭后闲来无事,终于静下心来有空写一写宏观经济分析。         回顾23年春节前的几个交易日,权益市场比较动荡,中证1000的平值隐含波动率最高冲到了91.48,要知道中证1000的实现波动率中位数也就15左右,而春节前几个交易日的连续大幅下跌和国家队快速出手使得权益市场走出深V形态,历史和隐含波动率也随之快速飙升。                另外伴随着雪球集体敲入、DMA爆仓等各类事件爆发,权益市场一片鬼哭狼嚎,就在大家都在讨论这波大A行情该谁来背锅时,证监会突发换帅。想想之前频繁出现在财经类流量博主文章中的北向、量化、公墓等,这次券商场外衍生品和私募微盘股应该也难逃一劫。都说经济繁荣时,大家都忙着数钱根本没有人在意合不合规,经济衰退时,你连呼吸都是错的,人性就是如此。关于现有微观市场体制的一些问题我之前也写过一些文章,这里不想再赘述,这里只想探讨一下宏观经济形势问题。         经济活动存在周期,这是我们初学经济学时就所熟知的,一个完整的经济周期包含繁荣、衰退、萧条和复苏四个阶段,每个阶段一般没有固定的时间长度和明显的分界线。但是如果回顾国内经济发展的历史情况,我们便可以大致发现国内经济增长开始下滑并不是近两年才开始的,三年疫情只是一场突如其来的黑天鹅,并没有影响整个大经济周期的演变方向。              从上图不难看出,从2001年加入世贸组织后,我国经济增长率同比逐年上升,呈现出快速发展的繁荣景象,也就是当时全球媒体称赞的“中国速度”。直到2008年,美国次贷危机爆发,中国也深受波及,随后政府出台了史上最大规模的“4万亿”扩张政策,虽然帮助中国摆脱了金融危机的泥潭,但也造成了后续非常严重的产能过剩、通货膨...

Total Pageviews

READING 69: PRINCIPLES FOR SOUND STRESS TESTING PRACTICES AND SUPERVISION

Stress Testing Integration And Methods

        Stress testing is an important tool that enables a bank to identify, assess, monitor, and manage risk. Recent financial turmoil has substantially increased the need for flexible, comprehensive, and forward-looking stress testing.

Stress Testing and Risk Governance

        Major weaknesses and recommendations for stress testing and integration in risk governances are as follows. Weaknesses: lack of involvement of board and senior management, lack of overall organizational view, lack of fully developed stress testing, lack of adequate response to crisis. Recommendations: Stress testing should form an essential ingredient of overall governance of risk management plan, encompass multiple techniques and perspectives, involve a sound infrastructure and regular assessment, produce written policies and recommendations, and generate comprehensive firm and market-wide scenario testing.
         Stress testing methodologies were based on inadequate infrastructure, inadequate risk assessment approaches, inadequate recognition of correlation, and inadequate firm-wide perspectives. Given these weaknesses, recommendations for improvement include development of a comprehensive stress testing approach, identification and control of risk concentrations, and multiple measurements of stress impact.
         Stress testing scenarios lacked depth and breadth because they were based on mild shocks, shorter duration, and smaller correlation effects among various markets, portfolios, and positions.
        Banks evaluated the risk of complex structured products based on the credit rating of similar cash instruments. However, the nature, magnitude, and sources of risk for these products are different from non-structured products. In order to identify, assess, monitor, and control risk exposure of complex structured products, stress testing plans should utilize all the relevant information about the underlying asset pool, market conditions, contractual obligations, and subordination levels.
         Historically, stress testing has not fully recognized funding liquidity risk and its correlation with other risks in times of crises. Future stress tests should focus more on correlations of various factors and risks, including funding liquidity risk.

Stress Testing Principles

        Principles for sound stress testing supervision include: assessing stress testing methods, taking corrective actions, challenging firm-wide scenarios, evaluating capital and liquidity needs, applying additional stress scenarios, and consulting additional resources.

Popular Posts